data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03e64/03e64fc749cb52f3563aea4803a8a48d4e46994c" alt="The downside supertall tower creaks"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca7e6/ca7e6edab9d93d673e8a3324fb6ec9df53cd2d0a" alt="the downside supertall tower creaks the downside supertall tower creaks"
The conceptual project Planet City that tackles future urban problems by Liam Young, image via Worldarchitecture. The question requiring reflection becomes: Should we, as architects, stop designing and pursuing the skinniest and tallest buildings, as we wait to be sure that these technical issues can be well handled? Sometimes, even though all technical issues are predicted and thoroughly considered, any small mistake in the building’s design, construction or maintenance could still trigger the above problems. Additional problems include drastically difficult emergency evacuation, undesirable stack effect and noises caused by air friction in deep elevator shafts, extra efforts to set up and maintain water and electricity supply for the whole building, etc.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/518e3/518e31ec212b6563bac58a822d10877cff39ea78" alt="the downside supertall tower creaks the downside supertall tower creaks"
For example, the elevators, a necessity of skyscrapers, are highly likely to malfunction due to possibility of uneven force distributions among elevator cables, especially when buildings sway severely during windy days. In September 2021, residents sued the building’s developers based on the engineering report.Īs architects, we know that a part of the reasons for the high price is that these foreseeable technical problems on super skinny towers are difficult and costly to tackle - or to ever fully solve. So far, more than 1,500 construction and design defects were identified as “life safety issues” by the engineering consultant. Unfortunately, apart from the house price, residents in 432 Park Avenue have now had to spend extra money hiring engineering consultants and lawyers in order to fight for the comfortable and safe domestic living that they say that they paid for. The 425-meter-tall residential tower, which includes 125 living units whose price ranges from some 5 million dollars to over 100 million dollars, is supposed to offer privileged living experiences. For those who haven’t followed the coverage, residents in this building were caged for hours due to the unstable elevator services on multiple occasions. The burgeoning legal saga of 432 Park Avenue in Manhattan, New York indicates that the unsolved technical problems in the super-high-rise residential buildings, such as flooding pipes, unstable elevator services and constant noises caused by structural components, are more than inconvenient they could become life-threatening to their residents. Image by The Skyscraper Museum Millions of Dollars for Living in the Sky: Is It Even Worth It? No longer designed to solve urban problems, are these structures destined to become problematic in and of themselves? As these residential towers grow taller, they become attenuated. No longer dedicated to solving the housing problems for dense populations, architects who undertake these projects guarantee buyers the best view of the cityscape (for those on the upper floors), while also maximizing the profits of the developer by reaching taller and taller. Just as some skyscrapers advertise the privilege of working beyond the clouds, more and more developers are aspiring to satisfy the desires of the world’s elite to flex their wealth and status by promising them a home up in the air. However, as super-high-rise office buildings in central business districts compete for the top height - in many parts of the work, to accommodate more companies or satisfy certain business demands - the question worth asking: should residential buildings also compete to be the tallest and skinniest one? In recent years, New York has been a testing ground for the answer to this question. Such scenes have already been depicted in many architects’ futuristic urban designs. The future city, according to the booming trends of building up, might be a skyscraper forest. High-rise buildings have long been seen as a problem-solver capable of vertically expanding the limitations of a small site footprint in order to provide more residential and working spaces in cities. Click here to sign up for our Jobs Newsletter.Īs the sea-level rises, increasing population and diminishing flatlands pose the following conundrum: How can humanity accommodate more people with limited lands? This is quickly becoming an essential and typical urban problem for architects, developers and local government. Browse the Architizer Jobs Board and apply for architecture and design positions at some of the world's best firms.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03e64/03e64fc749cb52f3563aea4803a8a48d4e46994c" alt="The downside supertall tower creaks"